Marvin Bonds

Case #: 12PB2806
Police badge #: 14710
Download original case files
- 12PB2806_Decision.pdf

Recommendation Termination
Decision Suspension
Length of process 8 months July 02, 2012 to February 21, 2013 Closed

Charged with violating 2 rules on 5 counts


Rule 2	3 counts	Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department. Count 1 Not Guilty The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, Officer Bonds, while on duty, impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department when he entered and/or searched the apartment of Brenda Hines without a warrant and/or consent and/or valid consent. Count 2 Not Guilty The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:Count II: On or about April 1, 2009, and/or October 7, 2009, during his interview with the Independent Police Review Authority (“IPRA”), Officer Bonds impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department in that he stated that on or about February 4, 2009, Sergeant Jesse Terrazas was present during the consent to search incident at the apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, or stated words to that effect,when Sergeant Terrazas was not at the scene during the search. Count 3 Not Guilty The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department, in that:Count III: On or about April 1, 2009, during his interview with IPRA, Officer Bonds impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department in that he stated that on or about February 4, 2009, Brenda Hines and/or the “leaseholder” let Officer Prieto into the apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, or stated words to that effect, when she did not let in Officer Prieto.
Rule 14	2 counts	Making a false report, written or oral. Count 1 Not Guilty The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:Making a false report, written or oral,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:Count I: On or about April 1, 2009, and/or October 7, 2009, during his interview with the Independent Police Review Authority (“IPRA”), Officer Bonds made a false statement in that he stated that on or about February 4, 2009, Sergeant Jesse Terrazas was present during the consent to search incident at the apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, or stated words to that effect, when Sergeant Terrazas was not at the scene during the search. Count 2 Not Guilty The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 14:Making a false report, written or oral,in that:Count II [mislabeled Count III on the filed Charges and Specifications]: On or about April 1, 2009, during his interview with IPRA, Officer Bonds made a false statement in that he stated that on or about February 4, 2009, Brenda Hines and/or the “leaseholder” let Officer Prieto into the apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, or stated words to that effect, when she did not let in Officer Prieto.

Rule 2

Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.

Count 1 Not Guilty: The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that:Count I: On or about February 4, 2009, at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, Officer Bonds, while on duty, impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department when he entered and/or searched the apartment of Brenda Hines without a warrant and/or consent and/or valid consent.
Count 2 Not Guilty: The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge:Count II: On or about April 1, 2009, and/or October 7, 2009, during his interview with the Independent Police Review Authority (“IPRA”), Officer Bonds impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department in that he stated that on or about February 4, 2009, Sergeant Jesse Terrazas was present during the consent to search incident at the apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, or stated words to that effect,when Sergeant Terrazas was not at the scene during the search.
Count 3 Not Guilty: The Respondent, Police Officer Marvin Bonds, Star No. 14798, charged herein, is guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department, in that:Count III: On or about April 1, 2009, during his interview with IPRA, Officer Bonds impeded the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or brought discredit upon the Department in that he stated that on or about February 4, 2009, Brenda Hines and/or the “leaseholder” let Officer Prieto into the apartment at or about 4740 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago, or stated words to that effect, when she did not let in Officer Prieto.