Edgar Del Olmo

Any action or conduct which impedes the Department's efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department.

Count 1 Not Guilty

The Respondent, Police Officer Edgar Del Olmo, Star No. 9653, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2:Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department, in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: Count I: From at least on or about July 16, 2010, to the present, or for some time period therein, Officer Edgar Del Olmo failed to actually be a resident of the City of Chicago in that he resided at xxxxx South Kolin Avenue, Oak Lawn, Illinois, thereby impeding the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.

Count 2 Not Guilty

The Respondent, Police Officer Edgar Del Olmo, Star No. 9653, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 2: Any action or conduct which impedes the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals or brings discredit upon the Department, in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: Count II: From at least on or about July 16, 2010, to the present, or for some time period therein, Officer Edgar Del Olmo resided at xxxxx South Kolin Avenue, Oak Lawn, Illinois, but on his Employee Change of Address Form dated on or about November 3, 2008, he declared his Former Address as xxx East Oakwood Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60653, and his New Address as xxxx North Milwaukee Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60622, and on his Employee Change of Address Form dated on or about November 2, 2010, he declared his New Address as “SAME,” thereby impeding the Department’s efforts to achieve its policy and goals and/or bringing discredit upon the Department.

Failure to actually reside within the corporate boundaries of the City of Chicago.

Count 1 Not Guilty

The Respondent, Police Officer Edgar Del Olmo, Star No. 9653, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit:Rule 25: Failure to actually reside within the corporate boundaries of the City of Chicago,in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: From at least on or about July 16, 2010, to the present, or for some time period therein, Officer Edgar Del Olmo resided at xxxxx South Kolin Avenue, Oak Lawn, Illinois, thereby failing to actually reside within the corporate boundaries of the City of Chicago.

Failure to provide the Department with a current address and telephone number.

Count 1 Not Guilty

The Respondent, Police Officer Edgar Del Olmo, Star No. 9653, charged herein, is not guilty of violating, to wit: Rule 26:Failure to provide the Department with a current address and telephone number, in that the Superintendent did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following charge: From at least on or about July 16, 2010, to the present, or for some time period therein, Officer Edgar Del Olmo resided at xxxxx South Kolin Avenue, Oak Lawn, Illinois, but on his Employee Change of Address Form dated on or about November 3, 2008, he declared his Former Address as xxx East Oakwood Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60653, and his New Address as xxxx North Milwaukee Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60622, and on his Employee Change of Address Form dated on or about November 2, 2010, he declared his New Address as “SAME,” thereby failing to provide the Department with a current address.